The setup: I am in the process of changing the way a program works under the hood. In the current version works like this:
I\'m just trying to clear up some concepts here. If anyone is willing to share their expertise on this matter, it\'s greatly appreciated it.
I\'m making asynchronous requests with WebRequest.BeginGetResponse to download files from a server. All works nice but I want to download no more of 5 files at the same time. In Java I would use a fix
MAIN QUESTION: I am using Workflow Foundation 4.0 in which the WorkflowRuntime has been replaced by the WorkflowApplication as a workflow host for a single instance.
I want to add new TabTtems to my TabControl, but each TabItem must run on it\'s own thread. What would be the best way to achieve this?
I\'m using a ConcurrentLinkedQueue to store computational steps, and an ExecutorService created by Executors.newFixedThreadPool to execute them out. My problem is that the application never terminates
So, I\'m pretty new to multi-threading and have been using this idea in all my programs lately. Before I start using it more I really want to make sure it is a correct efficient way to implement multi
I\'m using the ExecutorService to process thousands of small independent tasks. Each task, on completion, stores the result (which is either true of false).
I have a ThreadPoolExecutor that is constructed with an unbounded queue (LinkedBlockingQueue) and a core and max pool size set to the number of cpus (say 4).
I\'m running a process in a separate thread with a timeout, using an ExecutorService and a Future (example code here) (the thread \"spawning\" takes place in a AOP Aspect).