Here\'s a simple javascript program: var $d = {}; var AudioPlayer = function(filename, timeUpdateCallback, playbackDone){
I think this is a newbie question but why it fails on the last assertion? I was thinking that the closure binds the value on it, so changing it fro开发者_StackOverflowm the closure will change the val
I think I understand why there is a danger in allowing closures in a language using dynamic scope.That is, it seems you will be able to close the variable OK, but when trying to read it you will only
I want to do something that in a classical object oriented language like Java, C# etc. is very easy to do.I simply want to access a property of an instantiated object.The object is globally scoped in
A php closure or anonymous function is used to create function without specifying its name. Is it possible to call them without assigning to identi开发者_运维知识库fier as we do in JavaScript ?
Quick question: is there a way to provide a closure in PHP to some equivalent function to the array_unique function so that you can specify your own comparison closure to be used when comparing two it
Is there any problem with such closure implementation (stolen from pyth开发者_高级运维on hack)?
I want to add a has_many through association to a activerecord model class for each symbol in an array. for example
As a followup to Setting javascript defineGetter and defineSetter in a loop I\'m now having troubles with defining setters in a loop.
In terms of runtime, what is the best known transitive closure algorithm for directed graphs? I am curre开发者_高级运维ntly using Warshall\'s algorithm but its O(n^3). Although, due to the graph repr