Debugging one of my projects I noticed another developer had changed the $(document).ready() function to generate a closure inside of itself. E.G. $(document).ready(function($) { }); I am curious as t
So I\'m trying to use the TPL features in .NET 4.0 and have some code like this (don\'t laugh): /// <summary>Fetches a thread along with its posts.Increments the thread viewed counter.</summ
So I have the following: Object a = data.getA(); Object b = data.getB(); Object c = data.getC(); // and so on
I\'d like to be more explicit about my closures regarding their argument types.So I would write something like
I tested the following code in Racket/DrScheme: (define (makem) (define x 34) (list (lambda () (set! x (+ x 1)) x)
See code below. I\'ve tried to strip it to its bare bones. I have a _queue array. I want to iterate 10 times. On each iteration, I want to create a function that has a properly scoped reference for j
I do not understand this behavior: var a = 1; console.log(\'a is undefined1:\', a == undefined); var a; //iterate selected jQuery elements:
I find the use of the C++0x closure perplexing. My initial report, and the subsequent one, have generated more confusion than explanations. Below I will show you troublesome examples, and I hope to fi
When I\'m trying to serialize an object which has members including closures an exception is thrown.
I would like to do the something along the following: for (var i = 0; i < 10; ++i) { createButton(x, y, function() { alert(\"button \" + i + \" pres开发者_StackOverflow社区sed\"); }
加载中,请稍侯......