So when I started trying to build my websites in an n-tier architecture, I was worried about performance.
Im having problems naming my classes and services correctly when utils and other help classes are involved.
In a traditional sense, N-tier means separating the application into \"tiers\" and putting each \"tier\" on different servers. This was done for at least 3 reasons:
I\'ve seen some examples of ASP.NET MVC3 Scaffolding but those are always simple basic applications. What about layered/tiered solution with several Projects:
I\'ve recently started working on a project based on Microsoft .NET MVC 3. Progress has been good so far, but I keep having a nagging feeling that might design is not 100% as it should be, mostly rega
What is the best way and why? V1: try { var service = IoC.Resolve<IMyBLService>(); service.Do(); } catch(BLException ex)
What are the parameters on the basis of which a particular n-tier architecture is chos开发者_运维问答en for an application.Architecture (in general, not only n-tier) is chosen basing on a set of quali
This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time,or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applic
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: What are the pros and cons to keeping SQL in Stored Procs versus Code
Our architecture is a straightforward N-Tier model, which consists of a ASP.Net Application sitting in IIS7 (hosted in DiscountASP), that exposes methods on a WCF Service. Those methods talk to the DB