In others words I don\'t want a thread to wait if it cannot access the lock (as in synchonization), I want to thread execution to simply return immediately at that point if it cannot obtain the lock.
I want to check the state of a Semaphore to see if it is signalled or not (so if t is signalled, I can release it). How can I do this?
I\'m using a semaphore to hand work off to another thread in Python.I.e. the master thread will put an item on a queue, then call the semaphore\'s release method; the worker thread will call acquire o
I am working with Asp.net MVC 3. Any reason why I cannot create a single instance of a thread process in MVC? I am trying to allow a single instance of a worker process one at a time. however it is al
Our web servers have seen random PHP request failures for some requests that involve semaphores. We traced and suspected the request died somewhere due to sem_*() functions in PHP but we were unable t
My code have one thread continuosly handling objects queued by other threads. Queued objects are created using \"new\" in a function that will have finished when the object will be handled. I have no
I am trying to debug a multi-thr开发者_开发技巧eaded program that uses CSemaphore to limit the size of a buffer.
I am currently designing a C++ cross-platform (Linux/Windows) server application with a large-scale synchronization pattern. I internally use boost::thread as an abstraction of the OS-specific threads
Is it ok to initialize a semaphore any num开发者_运维百科ber of times within a program after being used so that it can be used again.
Note: I have heavily edited this question for clarity after making a mess of it brainstorming in public. However the actual algorithms described, and the question about whether they\'re sufficient to
加载中,请稍侯......