I\'m wondering when the GatheringByteChannel\'s write methods (taking in an array of ByteBuffers) have advantages over the \"regular\" WritableByteChannel write methods.
I am trying to use FileLock lock(long position, long size,boolean shared) in FileChannel object As per the javadoc it can throw OverlappingFileLockException. When I create a test program with 2 th
I know there are LOT of questions like that but I can\'t find on开发者_JAVA技巧e specific to my situation. I have 4x4 matrices implemented as NIO float buffers (These matrices are used for OpenGL). No
I would like to invoke http client method (HTTP PUT, GET, et al) within a bean, but I want these beans, either MDB or stateless session bean, run as quick as possible (with extreme short life time).
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this
I am writing a networking application using the java.nio api. My plan is to perform I/O on one thread, and handle events on another. To do this though, I need to synchronize reading/writing so that a开
The release notes for Java NIO (in Java 1.4+) state that support for direct ByteBuffers is an optional feature.I am curious which JVM vendors/flavors do not support it?Should a JNI library always code
Usually you have a single bound tcp port and several connections on these. At least there are usually more connections as bound ports. My case is different: I want to bind a lot of ports and usually h
The specification of ReadableByteChannel.read() shows -1 as result 开发者_运维问答value for end-of-stream. Moreover it specifies ClosedByInterruptExceptionas possible result if the thread is interrupt
From what I read about Java NIO and non-blocking [Server]SocketChannels, it should be possible to write a TCP server that sustains several connections using only one thread - I\'d make a Selector that
加载中,请稍侯......