After coming up against this problem myself in trying to implement a generic Vector2<int/float/double> in C#, I\'ve done a bunch of investigation into this problem, also described in this questi
Recently I tried to create a generic subclass by implementing a generic interface. public interface IModule<T> where T : DataBean { ..... }
I\'m looking for a shorter way (if there is one) to constraint a function. E.g. let inline sincos (a:\'T) =
F# is giving me some trouble with its type inference rules. I\'m writing a simple computation builder but can\'t get my generic type variable constraints right.
The intention开发者_StackOverflow of the following is to only allow the call IRegistration<Foo>.As<IFoo> if Foo implements IFoo:
I\'d like to do something like the following, but because T is essentially just a System.Object this won\'t work.I know T can be constrained by an interface, but that isn\'t an option.
I would like to implement a generic C# class which looks roughly as follows: abstract class Foobar<T> : AbstractBase, T
I have developed some extension methods for objects, which I don\'t want to be used/shown in intellisense for objects which implements IEnumerable. Conceptually I want something like as follows
I need to implement a static extension method supporting member constraints on some basic primitive types like integers, floats, etc. Here\'s my code for signe开发者_StackOverflowd integers:
Initial situation: I am working with a proprietary framework (ESRI\'s ArcGIS Engine) which I want to extend with some new functionality. I\'ve chosen to use extension methods in C# for this.
加载中,请稍侯......