In Javascript polluting the global namespace is generally regarded as a bad thing. This is why Coffeescript wraps all of your Javascript in a (function() {}).call(this); wrapper.
I am writing Qunit tests to test the validation engine of forms on our site.The structure of the form is standard with elements like the following:
How do you setup correct scoping in a QUnit test environment for testing callback functions? Code to test:
I\'m trying to get a simple test going with QUnit but it won\'t locate functions defined within $(document).ready().
Can someone provide an example of doing a setup/teardown model for async tests ajax requests on qunit?
I\'m having trouble making some method invocation assertions when testing a Javascript Object with QUnit + JsMockito. The basic infrastructure is working ok: Qunit, JsHamcrest(Jsmockito dependency) an
So QUnit provides the \"raise\" assertion to test if an exception is thrown. Is there any way to test the actual message thrown by the exception, though? For instance, say I have this function:
Following code works with JQuery 1.4.4. The result it prints is: Tests completed in 152 milliseconds. 1 tests of 1 passed, 0 failed.
I have a small amount of Javascript to test, but it operates on the entire page, for example, finding elements by numbered ids like \"#t34\".I need to create a handful of different pages to test the d
I\'m new to QUnit. I\'m using jQuery (tested with 1.4.2 and 1.5.1) and the latest QUnit. I can trigger events ju开发者_运维问答st fine in a single test, but any test afterwards fails. Here\'s a simpli