I am currently using the following code to include a file in my webpage: require_once $_SERVER[\'DOCUMENT_ROOT\'] . \'/include/file.php\';
I feel like I understand the difference between require and require_dependency (from How are require, require_dependency and constants reloading related in Rails?).
What I mean is whether writing something code in a file and then writing a require to it somewhere else is slower than writing the code in the file itself? (What about a req开发者_JAVA技巧uire to a fi
I have a single PHP file that i require in many different php files. The PHP file stores DB info and also requires another file called something.php....
I\'m having a strange error trying to run a Perl script with ActivePerl on Windows XP: >perl -d quick_translate_missing.pl < translate_en.txt > new.txt
When I do: lib = require(\'lib.js\')(app) is app actually geting passed in? in lib.js: exports = module.exports = function(app){}
I have a MainClass.php file with other .php files in the same directory. I noticed that I can include other .php file开发者_C百科s inside this file by using:
I\'am dabbling with the Zend framework and I have got a few things working, but some other things seem to be more of a chore to get working.
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicate: Why is require_once so bad to use?
I\'m setting a $baseurl in a settings.php file. In my index.php, I\'ve got 3 require() in a row for the settings.php/header.php/masthead.php.
加载中,请稍侯......