Does it actually work on some compilers/machines but on others it causes heap corruptions and crashes?
Correction: I messed up with the concept of pointer address and the address the pointer points to, so the following code has been modified.And now it prints out what I want, variable a, c, i, j, k, p
I recently read a lot abou开发者_StackOverflow中文版t \"preventing heap allocation for a class\" (see this question).
void someMe开发者_StackOverflow中文版thod() { byte[] array = { 0, 0 }; } Will this array be stored in heap or on the stack?You can think of it as always going on the heap.
It is widely known common sense, that for most algorithms, allocating and deallocating data on the stack is much faster than doing so on the heap. In C++, the difference in the code is like
My original code (following) gives a seg fault at the string array assignment at about num_atoms=150,000:
Could the own heap space be readed? could the software be self modified in memory? I write some code to show the subject,
I have a simple util that uses some unsafe code to get the file version information.when I compiled this as mixed platform (vs2008/.net 3.5)and deploy to 64 bit machine I get a heap corruption error.I
In our product we use a malloc implementation that relies exclusively on mmap for memory allocation.We also do a fair use of allocaing.We\'ve just encountered a problem where m开发者_如何转开发map wil
I have a J2EE project running on JBoss, with a maximum heap size of 2048m, which is giving strange results under load testing.开发者_高级运维 I\'ve benchmarked the heap and cpu usage and received the
加载中,请稍侯......