In short, when the property value changing, I have to update some logic in my code, for example: - (void)setProp:(NSString *)theProp
I have a NSManagedObject which I\'m trying to instantiate with given values. I access the setters like so:
When using @Autowired (not xml configuration), could someone compare the set/constructor binding advantages an开发者_开发百科d disadvantages?
Sorry, I\'m new to Java and there\'s probably a very simple answer to this. At the moment, I\'m printing all the results out in individual JOptionPanes.
I\'m using Sinatra (1.2) and RSpec (2.5) and would like to create a new object with an attribute TDD style. This is how the end result should look like:
Suppose you have a property with copy semantics. What should you do in the setter if the copy method fails? (I presume this is a possibility, since a copy usually starts with an alloc/init combo, whic
I\'m having trouble converting especially the getter and setter. public class CartItem : IEquatable<CartItem>
I am getting tired by adding tons of getters/setters all the time in my beans. Is there a simple way to use annotations to get rid of this stupid work?
In my program I have two classes, one called GlassPiece, and one called TrackerChip. These two objects are always \"strongly connected\", that is, no two GlassPieces can share a TrackerChip, and no t
The following code seems to create an ambiguity for the compiler (please see error commented near the bottom). Is it not possible to have getters and setters split between interfaces?
加载中,请稍侯......