We use FxCop\'s global suppressions to suppress rule violations found in old code.By old code I mean code that was written sometimes years before we turned on code analysis.We fix violations in new co
I have got strange problems in the last few days. Today\'s strange problem is about Code Analysis and TFS 2010 Builds.
I have a class that implements IDisposable because it has a private member field \"foo\" that is IDisposable (which is initialized in the constructor).I am unexpectedly getting a CA2000 Code Analysis
I am testing FxCop automation and want to validate it is screening and catching certain rules. I want to make a dll that will trigger the AvoidCallingProblematicMethods error in FxCop.
I am testing FxCop automation and want to validate it is screening and catching certain r开发者_如何学Goules. I want to make a dll that will trigger the RemoveCallsToGCKeepAlive error in FxCop.
I have a C++/CLI class definition where I\'m trying to get Equality testing to be Value based rahter than Reference (similar to the behavior of String).The following definitions work:
I was wondering what people\'s thoughts were on the CA1806 (DoNotIgnoreMethodResults)Static Code Analysis warning when using FxCop.
can anyone post the link to the Microsoft development best practices and guidelines? i have searched high and low for this and cant seem to find the resource i am looking for. In particular i am look
Due to reasons beyond my control (them being a DB of another system whose members follow different naming conventions) I have to make a class with a dozen of members that each fail 3 to 4 naming rules
开发者_如何学Go As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references,or expertise, but this question will likely so
加载中,请稍侯......