I was wondering if there are any alternatives for code analysis. I suppose one can create a code analyser from scratch though this is a te开发者_运维技巧dious work and I am not sure it worths it after
I have read several articles on when to use nested classes, but none that I\'ve found address my specific question.
The normal pattern for avoiding the CA2000 warning about non-disposed locals is to use a temp variable that gets disposed if anything goes wrong, like:
I know it sounds silly, but in regards to CA1709, should 开发者_开发问答we ignore this error and just do what Microsoft did (which is use Db as the acronym for Database)?
We have CODE_ANALYSIS defined in our C# components so that FxCop analyzes them when we build them on our development boxes. I would like to have FxCop turned off when it runs through our build system.
If you look at the code for a read-only collection it does not have an \"Add\" method, but instead defines the ICollection<T>.Add(T Value) method (explicit interface implementation).
I am trying to write a script to analyse C# code (batch script) 开发者_如何学编程using FxCop and integrate scripts into Hudson to automate the task. Can anyone can help? Even help to get me halfway is
I have a static class \'Defaults\' which shall hold default matrices that are forwarded to an interface that asks for double[][] in the end. So far I simply put static properties in this class that re
I\'m u开发者_JAVA百科sing code analysis in .NET 4, where I have a custom rule set included in the project file for my project.
I am using FxCop and codedthe following: public override void VisitBinaryExpression(BinaryExpression binaryExpression)
加载中,请稍侯......