Does the following variable, x, need to be volatile? Or does the manipulation within a utils.concurrent lock perform the same function as a synchronized block (ensuring it\'s written to memory, and
I am wondering at the difference between declaring a variable as volatile and always accessing the variable in a synchronized(this) block in Java?
I find myself wanting to write a routine that will operate on both volatile and non-volatile memory blocks. Something along the lines of:
This question already has answers here: What is the volatile keyword useful for? (25 answers) What is the "volatile" keyword used for?
I read some articles about the volatile keyword but I could not figu开发者_C百科re out its correct usage.Could you please tell me what it should be used for in C# and in Java?Consider this example:
Let\'s assume I\'m implementing a Winforms UI where all commands adhere to the following pattern: interface ICommand
Does a variable that is accessed by multiple threads, but only inside synchronized blocks, need the volatile modifier? If开发者_如何学Python not, why?You do not need to use volatile inside of synchron
Mmap returns a void*, but not a volatile void*. If I\'m using mmap to map shared memory, then another process could be writing to that memory, which means two subsequent reads from the same memory loc
[edit] For background reading, and to be clear, this is what I 开发者_StackOverflowam talking about: Introduction to the volatile keyword
Can the volatile be used for class objects? Like: volatile Myclass className; The problem is that it doesn\'t compile,
加载中,请稍侯......