I need to have atomic variables in my program. Previously I was using std::atomi开发者_StackOverflow中文版c<int>, but the platform in which I\'m working now does not have a g++ compiler that sup
Assume there are two threads running Thread1() and Thread2() respectively.The thread 1 just sets a global flag to tell thread 2 to quit and thread 2 periodically checks if it should quit.
I have a class like the below and am wondering, will this be thread-safe or can the main thread and the Loader thread possibly have their own copys of the mCache and therefore the get(..) method fail
Since Java 5, the volatile keyword has release/acquire semantics to make side-effects visible to other threads (including assignments to non-volatile variables!). Take these two variables, for example
I\'m familiar with the basic idea of volatile (to prevent compiler optimization of instructions involving values that may be accessed from multiple threads, in summary), but I\'ve noticed that example
I\'ve been using LazyReference class for a few years (not on a regular basis of course, but sometimes it is very useful). The class can be seen here. Credits go to Robbie Vanbrabant (class author) and
This question already has answers here: Closed 11 years ago. Possible Duplicates: Difference between volatile and synchronized in JAVA (j2me)
I\'m working on a multi threaded program that provides access to one side of an interprocess communication system. Having never used volatile, I\'m trying to figure out its proper usage.
So I am reading this book titled Java Concurrency in Practice and I am stuck on this one explanation which I cannot seem to comprehend without an example. This is the quote:
I was reading this article about volatile fields in C#. using System; using System.Threading; class Test
加载中,请稍侯......