From what I understand, the \'volatile\' modifie开发者_StackOverflowr in C# has two effects: Inserts fences as necessary for the target processor
Is it sufficient to declare an instance of a structure-typed variable as volatile (if its fields are accessed in re-entrant code), or must one declare specific fields of the structure as volatile?
Multiple texts say that when implementing double-checked locking in .NET the field you are locking on开发者_开发问答 should have volatile modifier applied. But why exactly? Considering the following e
I implementing a high performance thread safe component, using no lock statements, only volatile and Interlocked are used for performance reasons.
I have code listed here: Threading and Sockets. The answer to that question was to modify isListening with volatile. As I remarked, that modifier allowed me to access the variable from another thread
Let\'s say I\'ve got a struct that consist of 100 bytes. What guarantees have I got about the following code?
In other words, can I do something with a volatile variable that could not also be solved with a normal variable an开发者_如何学Cd the Interlocked class?EDIT: question largely rewritten
Where is 开发者_如何学Ca volatile variable stored in the program memory (in which section)?volatile is a type qualifier not a storage class specifier, so it does not determine storage location at all;
Reading a few threads (common concurrency pro开发者_StackOverflow社区blems, volatile keyword, memory model) I\'m confused about concurrency issues in Java.
I have a multi-R/W lock class that keeps the read, write and pending read , pending write counters. A mutex guards them from multiple threads.
加载中,请稍侯......