I\'m toying with buffer overflows, but I\'m confused by what I\'m finding when running the following simple C program on Mac OS.
For the actual question, jump to question part. For an interesting real-world example of undefined behavior, keep reading :)
Consider the following program, which is obviously buggy: #include <cstdio> double test(int n) { if (n % 2 == 0)
I had a problem with a function: int parsearRestricciones(char linea[], unsigned int& x, unsigned int& y, unsigned int& tiempo, char restric[])
I took a look at the draft C++0x standard, and as far as I can tell there is nothing about stack overflow in there. Searching for \"stack overflow\" yields no results, and searching for \"stack\" I\'v
Following is a simple case of counting objects: struct A { static int count; A () { ++ count; } }; Now, its object and static member are 开发者_如何学Pythondeclared as:
This quicksort is supposed to sort \"v[left]...v[right] into increasing order\"; copied (without comments) from The C Programming Language by K&R (Second Edition):
Suppose in bar.h there might exist: static inline int fun () { return 2; } And to ensure that fun is always defined foo.h contains the following:
Is it a guarantee that state after this code will be LX_DONE开发者_如何学Go? enum lx_state { LX_START, LX_MIDDLE, LX_DONE };
I know that deleteing a null pointer is a no-op: In either alternative, if the value of the operand of delete is the null pointer the operation has no effect.