I tried to use an extended PersistenceContext in a component by adding @Pe开发者_StackOverflow中文版rsistenceContext(type=PersistenceContextType.EXTENDED)
I\'ve got a Map<String, Person> (actually I\'m using a more complex POJO but simplifying it for the sake of my question)
My problem is, that I have simple Pojos or simply objects that contain data. These can vary and new types of these can be added during runtime.
So I started to write a POJO class, created public variables and now want to get getters and setters for them (folowing Java Naming Conventions)
Well, it may be a idiot idea... Bu开发者_JS百科t we need DropDownList.java to wrap all data of a \"List employees\" dropdown list. The object is populated at server side and used by JSP and javascript
POJO is the norm in Spring but also pervasive in the Java EE world. One non-POJO stronghold is Servlet. I\'m wondering if any open source ever appeals to change.
I\'m borrowing the \"slice\" meaning from C++. Let\'s say I hava a simple POJO that\'s persisted via Hibernate:
Are the notions mentionned in the question title synonymous to a 开发者_StackOverflowcertain degree? Where do the main differences lie (context, structure, ...) and can one be considered a subset of a
I have a POJO, and a (currently not-yet-built) class that will return Lists of it. I\'d like to automatically generate the code necessary for the POJO to be accessed as a 开发者_JAVA技巧Map. Is this a
This question already has a开发者_StackOverflownswers here: Closed 12 years ago. Possible Duplicates:
加载中,请稍侯......