When a function which take a pointer in argument is inlined, does the compiler remove the indirection during the optimization process ? Of course when it makes sense..
I have found the list of ifort debug flags. However, I am开发者_JAVA百科 confused about some explanation of debug flags. As it stated, -debug can be configured as all, full, minimal and none. May I as
Notice: I noticed this question is a lot related to this one, so if you\'re somebody interested in my question, you should definitely read that other one and its answers too.
A followup to Does .NET JIT optimize empty loops away?: The following program just runs an empty loop a billion times and prints out the time to run.It takes 700 ms on my machine, and I\'m curious if
Earlier today, as I was coding a method and it struck me that I wasn\'t sure exactly why the idiom I was implementing compiles.If everything else is abstracted away, it would look something like this:
I am not sure what am I doing wrong, but I\'ve tried reading manuals about calling conventions of GCC and found nothing useful there. My current problem is GCC generates excessively LARGE code for a v
Some functions which calculate booleans: bool a() { return trueorfalse; } bool b() { //... } bool c() { //... } This condition
I\'m inspecting Visual C++ 10 optimization capabilities and found a rather curious thing. All code herein is compiled with /O2.
Often times you see things like std::map<std::string, somethingelse> m_named_objects; or std::string state;
Say, I have a code which calls some function millions time from loop and I want the code to be fast: def outer_function(file):
加载中,请稍侯......