Fairly new to Java, but I\'m wondering why package access is considered \"more restrictive\" than subclass access. That is, every access modifier which provides subclasses with access to a member also
What are the differences between the following: Private Sub Private Function Private Class When should each one开发者_开发知识库 be used?Private is a modifier than gives the scope of the class, s
Is there any reason to have a private constant, that is not static? Are there any situations that you would need a non-static private const? Would it make sense if constants where static by default?
I am developing a class library that will be used in several projects. In my class library, I have a \"Shape\" Class which has a number of properties.
In VB6/VBA, you can declare module-level variables outside of a specific Sub or Function method.I\'ve used Private and Public before inside modules and understand them like so:
What is the difference between the internal and private acces开发者_开发知识库s modifiers in C#?internal is for assembly scope (i.e. only accessible from code in the same .exe or .dll)
I\'m a bit stuck on this SCJP practice question, specifically line 5 (with the String constructor). I thought it should be private, but the solution is \'protected\'. I think protected access would no
Im trying to understand the benefits of making a class variable private, versus public. I understand getters / setters to access / modify the private / protected data, but is its sole purpose is开发者
Ok so I was just thinking to my开发者_运维百科self why do programmers stress so much when it comes down to Access Modifiers within OOP.
I\'m developing a library which the other programmer will import and use it for their purposes. I\'m confused about the objective of Java access modifier.
加载中,请稍侯......