It seems that in most cases the C# compiler could call Dispose() automatically. Like most cases of the using pattern look like:
This seems like a fairly straightforward question, but I couldn\'t find this particular use-case after some searching around.
In my Dispose methods (like the one below), everytime i want to call someObj.Dispose() i also have a check for someObj!=null.
I have the following code: public void Dispose() { if (_instance != null) { _instance = null; // Call GC.SupressFinalize to take this object off the finalization
I\'ve been googling a ton on repository patterns with Linq over the last few days. There\'s a lot of info out there but it\'s often contradictory and I\'m still looking for a definitive source.
I\'m trying to use a generic class in a using statement but the compiler can\'t seem to treat it as implementing IDisposable.
I asked to my frien开发者_JAVA技巧d about this question, he said that it is used for destroying the object created during the exception handling. But in c# GC is there for destroying such kinds of unu
My code looks like the below. Obviously I can\'t write \'Ok\' because the object has been disposed. I can\'t do return sw.Clone() because clone doesn\'t exist. If I don\'t use a using then at any poin
Imagine a: public class Global : IDisposable { private static readonly List<IDisposable> Disposables = new List<IDisposable>();
I have a Visual Studio 2008 C# .NET 2.0 CF project with an abstract class derived from Component. From that class, I derive several concrete classes (as in my example below).
加载中,请稍侯......