I\'m having an issue using the default VS doctype of <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN\"
XHTML 1.1 is intended to be used with the \"application/xhtml+xml\" MIME type. Yet almost no one does this, because IE doesn\'t handle the \"application/xhtml+xml\" MIME type correctly, and draconian
I want posting in my website to be as rich HTML tags as possible, but safe. this is tags used in my website:
I am having issues making my footer stick to the bottom of the page in all browsers. I have the following document structure:
I have the following code: CSS part: <style type=\"text/css\"> .menu { width:200px; } .menu ul { list-style-image:none;
I am retrofitting rollout menus into an existing site and it is looking fine everywhere but IE.Here\'s a hidden page with the new menuing:http://preemiestoday.com/pages/about_board.php
In order to define charset for HTML5 Doctype, which notation should I use? Short: <meta charset=\"utf-8\" />
I\'m creating a doctype for XML files I\'m working with to simplify their validation. However, I\'d like to express something and I don\'t know how.
Why is there a carriage return in the HTML 4 & XHTML DOCTYPE declarations? Eg: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN\"
I am developing fo开发者_开发百科r SharePoint 2007 and my pretty code is being broken, presumably by code SharePoint generates around my Content Editor web-part. My understanding is, because there is