Closures are an incredibly useful language feature.They let us do clever things that would otherwise take a lot of code, and often enable us to write code that is more elegant and more clear.In Python
I have models like this: class Person has_many :phones ... end class Phone belongs_to :person end I want to forbid changing phones associated to person when some condition is met. Forbidden field
I would like to show a radio button, have its value submitted, but depending on the circumstances, have it not editable. Disabled doesn\'t work, because it doesn\'t submit the value (or does it?), and
.NET v2 When the List has a very useful (4 me) method AsReadOnly() the LinkedList does not have su开发者_开发问答ch a method.
Take the following property: public string Foo { get; private set; } Using reflection, I can still set the value of this property from outside the owning class.Is there a way to prevent this?Removi
I heard that in C, if I do char *s = \"hello world\". the \"hello world\" is actually stored in read-only memory.
I have some git repositories accessed remotely through SSH and I want to make some of them read-only to prevent more pushes. Some people have remotes pointing to these repositories.
I\'m creating an iPhone App and am wondering whether Core Data is better for readonly data than a SQLite database. It feels like the SQLite DB is the better choice, is that right? Can I even pre-fill
In a C# WinForms app, I am using System.IO.Diagnostics.Process.Start(fileName) to open files.The type of file can be .doc, .docx, .xls, .xlsx, .csv, .pdf, or .txt.
IList<string> strList = new string[] { \"Apple\", \"Mango\", \"Orange\" }; IList<string> lst = new ReadOnlyCollection<string>(new[]{\"Google\",
加载中,请稍侯......