I created a web application using ASP.Net MVC 3 and EF 4.1, and I am using the UnitOfWork pattern, but nothing is getting committed to the database. All this is quite new to me, and I don\'t know wher
I\'m working on a small application that lets users create a list of words and the user is able to provide a name for the list. I setup the program to take advantage of the Unit of Work pattern. I wan
I am using nhibernate + fluent nhibernate asp.net mvc 3 ninject Currently I am using nhibernate, ninject with the repository pattern and service layers.
i have followed the pattern on this site to hook up ninject and nhibernate to my asp.net-mvc3 site. Here is the code in my global.aspx.cs:
Here at company we have several projects using ASP.Net MVC, jQuery, LinqToSql and StructureMap . Suppose I have this situation: A Company edit page. This page has 2 tabs: Details and Employees. Deta
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Using Unity when I \'new up\' an object that requires dependencies i.e. Repositories, UnitOfWork all is great, my new object gets the dependencies injected and the \'newed\' up object has control over
OK, I read these: EntityFramework show entities before saving changes Where added objects are stored in ObjectContext?
Im trying to implement a UnitofWork pattern using this Scott Allen tutorial My current SqlUnitOfWork is the folowing
Let me say, I have come to the conclusion (after a lot of trial) that Repository & Unit of Work when using Entity Framework is just wrong, wrong, wrong and this says why quite well.