I have encountered the #define pre-processor directive before while learning C, and then also encountered it in some code I read. But apart from using it to definite substitutions for constants and to
I have some C source files that need to be pre-processed so that I can use another application to add Code Coverage instrumentation code in my file.
Is there a way in C to ge开发者_如何学JAVAt the function name on which I can use token-pasting (I know __FUNCTION__ and __func__, but they don\'t expand to name at pre-processing,
I have a main directory A with two sub directories B and C. Directory B contains a header file structures.c:
When defining macro with zero arguments we can define it with parentheses, thus looking more like function开发者_StackOverflow社区 or without parentheses.
I\'d like to do something like this: class SomeClass { }; GENERATE_FUNTION(SomeClass) The GENERATE_FUNCTION macro I\'d like to define a function whose name is to be determined by the macro argumen
I have a number of .c and .h files with some parts of the code disabled by putting the code block in pre-processor directives e.g.
In my code, I have: #define EV( event ) SendEvent( new event ); E开发者_C百科V( evFormat ); But I want to pass a created object in the EV macro, like:
I know C++ template metaprogramming is Turing-complete. Does the s开发者_如何转开发ame thing hold for preprocessor metaprogramming?Well macros don\'t directly expand recursively, but there are ways we
I\'ve defined a class file, and I am using it for two purposes (in an attempt to adhere to the DRY principle).There are Attributes on some of the fields, which are used at runtime by program A.Program
加载中,请稍侯......