Scenario: I have many (potentially dozens) of ObservableCollection\'s being bound to ListBoxes at load time. These bindings are declared in their respective Xaml files. When the app first runs, it qu
I have a WPF ListBox control which displays items of an RSS feed. I occasionally check the source of the RSS feed for new items. Once I detect a new item I add it to the observable collection which im
I have several CollectionViewSource instances all used on the same ObservableCollection. I also have several controls that need to show filtered versions of the collection (hence the CollectionViewSou
Do you think this Model-ViewModel implementation is correct? Note that Stars (in the VM) is an ObservableCollection of VMs inside another one, and i feel like it decouples the VM from the M because w
I have an ObservableCollection, and I\'d like to set the content of an IList to this one. Now I could just create a new instance of开发者_如何学JAVA the collection..:
Sorry - my question is almost identical to this one but since it didn\'t receive a viable answer, I am hoping that someone else has some fresh ideas.
I\'ve got an ObservableCollection<A> a_collection; The collection contains \'n\' items. Each item A looks like this:
In my model I need to be made aware when a particular collection is changed so I am subscribing to the CollectionChanged event of the ObservableCollection. This is working really well except that the
dhopton\'s comment got me thinking.What are some situations where you开发者_开发问答 wouldn\'t want to use an ObservableCollection?When you want to have greater control over the notifications being se
According to MSDN there is an overload for the ObservableCollection constructor to which you can pass an IEnumerable. According to the very short MSDN page th开发者_如何学Cis will make a \"Copy\" of t
加载中,请稍侯......