How does Mercurial handle Alternate Data Streams (in the NTFS file system)? If it can\'t handle that, is there a DCVS that does?
I have a workflow question related to Mercurial (possibly applicable to other DVCS). The repo is set up using the typical default/stable setup.
I\'m converting a big (with about 9000 changesets) Subversion repository to Mercurial. It is coupled with Trac issue tracking system, so the commit logs have many cross-references to other revision ID
I am playing around with Mercurial to see if it is suitable for use in our company.One of the big selling points of it is the merging capabilities.So I have been playing around with creating branches
(I am newbie in mercurial. and version control. ) I am开发者_运维技巧 using an opensource framework clone from bitbucket(mercurial). whenever that framework is updated I run hg pull and hg update to
We have a small programming shop of at most 5 people working on a single project.I fully grok why DVCS is better for open source projects, and for large companies, but what advantages does it have for
In my setup I have a central Hg repo to which I\'m pushing my local changes.Say in my local clone I have a 开发者_Go百科series of local commits and then I want to push the changes to the central repo.
I have a commit on a public repository.I would like this commit to not be there (I\'ve moved that work off to a branch), I obviously don\'t开发者_如何学编程 want to destroy the branch history, basical
I\'m considering switching from HG to Plastic SCM (http://www.plasticscm.com, mainly because it seems to offer much nicer VS integration), and they promote \"task driven branching\", that is, branchin
From other questions I gather that the strength of the DVCS, the ease of me开发者_如何学Crges, comes from the fact that each revision knows its parents. Ever since SVN 1.5 came out over 2 years ago, t
加载中,请稍侯......