Before you ignore / vote-to-close this question, I consider this a valid question to ask because code clarity is an important topic of discussion, it\'s essential to writing maintainable code and I wo
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
i wonder where i should put the & properl开发者_开发百科y. $b =& $a; or $b = &$a; Both reference the same thing, just a matter of coding style.
if (false == x) { ...} as opposed to: if (!x) { ... } and if (false == f1()) { ...} as opposed to: if (!f1()) { ... }
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this
While working with WPF I switch between XAML and the designer. This causes the attributes on each element to be ordered differently and makes the code harder to read unless I go though and reorder eve
Everyone knows the advantages of a more readable code. So in order to make my code more readable what i开发者_如何学Python do normally is include thecommented class declaration in the implementation f
In C++ functions needed to be declared before they were called. This could be worked around with function signatures but for the most part this is no longer required in newer programming languages, C#
I often find myself with an Option[T] for some type T and wish to test the value of the option against some value. For example:
加载中,请稍侯......