The Scala Language Specification says under §3.2.1: A stable type is either a singleton type or a type which is declared to be
Consider something like this: object Singleton val cls: Class[Singleton] = ??? What do I have to write instead of ????
In a specific scenario here, I have a manger called UserManger used to handle CRUD for user This manager is \"Singleton\" and correct by design.
I have coded a Singeton compact logger which is very handy for ASP.NET applications. Just refrencing it and then Logger.Log.Info(\"Hello world!\");. It also logs unhandled exceptions automatically.
I know this topic has been discussed and killed over and over again, but I still had one doubt which I was hoping someone could help me with or guide me to a pre-existing post on SO.
I tried to extend an existing Singleton class in Ruby, as an example the Matrix class. My first quick&dirty solution was a monkey patch (reopen class and extend with functionality).
I m overriding the default asp.net Membership provider and making it a singleton class? Is it the right situation to implement singleton?
Please note that I have gone through the below thread : What is an efficient way to implement a singleton pattern in Java?
I co开发者_Python百科me from java/cpp environment where singletons do have their advantages over class(static) methods, however in objective-c because of it\'s dynamic nature, from my past observation
I\'ve been looking into how to best organise my libraries/classes recently and I\'m yet to come up with a satisfactory solution. That and it would just be a whole lot cleaner to write $xyz = new XyzIm
加载中,请稍侯......