I heard it\'s thread unsafe to do \"global_variable += individual_thread_data\"; for example [without locks].
I\'ve the following source code (adapted from my original code): #include \"stdafx.h\" #include <stdlib.h>
I have a project using pthreads; there\'s the main thread and a sub-thread and a pipe between them. It\'s all working fine, except sometimes it doesn\'t work. The sub thread runs a command interpreter
Im using Ubuntu 10.10, Code::Blocks with GCC 4.2. I have written a code like that: #include <iostream>
What is the relationship between ulimit -s <value> and the stack size (at thread level) in the Linux implementation (or for that matter any OS)?
fork()\'s behaviour is undefined if there are multiple threads in the process. How can I check that there is only a single th开发者_运维百科read (on linux primarily, but windows, darwin are also of in
So my question in C is: what is basically the differences (maybe pros and cons) of using a pthread barrier (init and wait..etc) compared to using the pthread Join in a loop.
Say a program spawns a thread. That thread calls func1(). However, func1() is also called in various places elsewhere in the main app. If i wrap it in a mutex lock in the thread only, will it be safe
Or should one first look at the drivers involved (e.g. OpenGL drivers in a game) or the X server, or a kernel bug?
What could be the cause if a call to pthread_cond_signal deadlocks? From what I understand (man page), it is implemented internally with a mutex, but what could cause this internal mutex lock operati
加载中,请稍侯......