I have a C++ program on Linux (CentOS 5.3) spawning multiple threads which are in an infinite loop to perform a job and sleep for certain minutes.
Is there any difference between the following pieces of code in terms of processor usage. void *ManageSequencer(void *argument){
I have a class, which has static function defined to work with C-style extern C { static void callback(foo bar) { } }. // static is defined in header.
I have two threads, communicating with each other; each thread employs \'while(1) ..\'. Now I need to let the threads exit upon a specific condition met, and therefore finish the application.
I have been having this problem wherein my threads stop execution and go into a wait state(reason : unknown). Pseudo code is posted below followed by some explanation
If I have some code that looks something like: typedef struct { bool some_flag; pthread_cond_tc; pthread_mutex_t m;
Hi when I run the following code, I find that the signaling thread continues to run for a long time before the other thread starts... why is that? isn\'t the woken up thread supposed to run as soon a
I\'d like to k开发者_如何转开发now how are mutex created on Linux? I figured out, that pthread_mutex_init() doesn\'t change value of pthread_mutex_t variable, so how it \"create\" mutex?
In the POSIX thread inte开发者_运维问答rface, pthread_join(thread) can be used to block until the specified thread exits.
Is there a problem with multiple threads 开发者_StackOverflow中文版using the same integer memory location between pthreads in a C program without any synchronization utilities?
加载中,请稍侯......