According to POSIX, It shall be safe to destroy an initialized condition variable upon which no threads are currently blocked.
I am using an old exam as a study guide and one of the questions is to use pthreads to fill in the following code:
I\'m trying to get pianobarfly working on OS X and can\'t get it to compile correctly. Selected text from the install document:
I have a C program where the main function creates threads and I have to debug one thread. I am using gdb for he same. However I cannot \"break\" or \"watch\" variables on specific C files of this pro
I have a class called CSum which contains a static method who\'s identifier is: static double fileProc(string myFile);
I have multiple threads reading same int variable. and one thread is writing the va开发者_运维百科lue.
Are there ways to implement named process internal mutexes using C/C++ (in Unix/开发者_Go百科Linux)?
similar c++ code as below is written for an embedded device. the process running on the device crashes upon start. on some other version of the device, crash is not observed. can it be related to the
I\'m implementing pthread condition variables (based on Linux futexes) and I have an idea for avoiding the \"stampede effect\" on pthread_cond_broadcast with process-shared condition variables. For no
Suppose a condition variable is used in a situation where the signaling thread modifies the state affecting the truth value of the predicate and calls pthread_cond_signal without holding the mutex ass
加载中,请稍侯......