I have a class Exporter which has a generic method which accepts an IEnumerable<T> and creates an export document by enumerating its property values using reflection:
Shouldn’t this definition be allowed in a lazy language like Haskell in which functions are curried?
I have a coworker that is against type inference in C#. I believe most of his arguments surrounded lack of readability. My argument against that is that Visual Studio\'s intellisense features provide
In Haskell, it is considered good practice to explicitly declare the type signature of your开发者_运维问答 functions, even though it can (usually) be inferred. It seems like this isn\'t even possible
The following doesn\'t compile. Do I need to cast the person first? object People { def all = List( new Person(\"Jack\", 33),
Given a type declared as shown below public cla开发者_开发知识库ss EqualityProbe<T> { public EqualityProbe( Func<T> functionToGetActualValue, T expectedValue, string probeDescription) {..
Good day. Here is simple \"guess number\" snippet and it contains single error, but compiler makes it really hard to undertstand what is wrong:
In the Scala Collections framework, I think there are some behaviors that are counterintuitive when using map().
I\'m testing the following code to populate a dictionary recursively. However the type inferencedoes not seem to recognize the dictionary type.I\'ve tried using a type annotation but that did not seem
We just hit an interesting error on our build server when compiling some recent changes from the command line:
加载中,请稍侯......