I\'ve got a function which takes an input of type (\'a * (float * \'b * float)) list Where I\'d obviously like to avoid having to explicitly include the type.
Why does Scala fail to infer the return type of the method when there\'s an explicit return statement us开发者_如何学JAVAed in the method?
Is it possible to query the ghci for the type i开发者_Python百科t inferred for a function inside another function?This is a quick and ugly hack, but what I usually do is just use the function in the w
Suppose I have public static List<T2> Map<T,T2>(List<T> inputs, Func<T, T2> f)
I have the following expression: getCount :: (Num a) => a -> [a] getCount int = foldl processOneCount
I understand that the C# keyword var implies the type at compile time and therefore requires the declaration and assignment in the same place, making the following construct illegal:
I was trying to make a tail-recursive version of this very simple SML function: fun suffixes [] = [[]]
I want to refine the raw text by using regular expression, given a list of (patten,replacement) tuple.
We\'re gettin\' hairy here. I\'ve tested a bunch of tree-synchronizing code on concrete representations of data, and now I need to abstract it so that it can run with any source and target that suppor
I\'m still trying to map my deep and old knowledge from C/C++ to my somewhat more shallow .Net knowledge. Today the time has come to \"as\" (and implicitly \"is\" and cast) in C#.