I\'m working on an experimental programming language that has global polymorphic type inference. I recently got the algorithm working sufficiently well to correctly type the bits of sample code I\'m
I was p开发者_C百科laying around with ListW.<^>, the definition of which is as follows: def <^>[B: Zero](f: NonEmptyList[A] => B): B = value match {
In my own code, and on numerous mailing list postings, I\'ve notic开发者_JS百科ed confusion due to Nothing being inferred as the least upper bound of two other types.
I have this class in Scala: object Util { class Tapper[A](tapMe: A) { def tap(f: A => Unit): A = { f(tapMe)
Ok, I\'ve been reading everything I can find on var, and I\'m pretty sure I\'ve got a handle on their basic behaviors and type inference. I\'ve always been a big proponent of explicit types, so var ma
I was trying some code segment from one of the blog and I came to no开发者_开发知识库tice the following code
I find myself using a lot of nested maps, e.g a Map[Int, Map[String, Set[String]]], and I\'d like to have new Maps, Sets, etc. created automatically when I access a new key. E.g. something like the fo
Given the interface: public interface BasedOnOther<T, U extends BasedList<T>> { public T getOther();
So, I have a class with a constructor like this: public FilterList(Set<Integer> labels) { ... } and I want to construct a new FilterList object with an empty set. Following Joshua Bloch\'s ad
When trying to compile the following code in LINQPad : void Main() { DriveInfo.GetDrives().Select(GetProviderName).Dump();
加载中,请稍侯......