In the life-cycle of my application, I have to re-create an ArrayList that contains other ArrayLists of objects (reading them from storage). The ArrayList is always assigned to the same data member in
The manual said that The destructor method will be called as soon as all references to a particular object are removed or when the object is explicitly
For the curious: It turns out my memory leak had nothing to do with what I put in the sample here.I thought I had the issue nailed down to some sample code, but my sample code had different issues.I d
IS there a way to set a garbage collector only for one type, like in Objective C when you do [Oppsie release]; Or is there a similar way in Java. I was thin开发者_Go百科king for setting Oppsie to null
I understand how weak references work, but I am bit confused regarding it\'s use in actionscript event listeners. Consider the example below:
The problem is that some how due to garbage collection timings I am having tradeoff\'s in my performance. The issue can be generalized as:
I am porting the \'iw\' command to Android.This is wireless related.It appears that the iw tool has a set of commands that can be used, however from another user\'s site:
I\'ve often heard that these methods (Object.hashCode and System.identityHashCode) return the address of the object, or something computed quickly from the address; but I\'m also pretty sure the garba
fo开发者_开发技巧r example, let\'s take a programmatic binding: Binding binding = new Binding(\"MyProperty\");
I have a JavaScript application that uses XMLHttpRequest to fetch and parse about 60,000 XML documents. However, IE\'s memory usage grows quickly, and eventually the program crashes. I suspect this ha