I was开发者_如何转开发 reading the C# entry on Wikipedia, and came across: Managed memory cannot be explicitly freed; instead, it is automatically garbage collected.
I\'ve been developing a minimalistic Java rich client CRUD application fr开发者_StackOverflowamework for the past few years, mostly as a hobby but also actively using it to write applications for my c
Will garbage collector free resources for cross referenced object/class, which is no longer referenced from main program.
I\'m looking for arguments as to how best to size the young generation (with respect to the old generation) in an environment where low latency is critical.
I am running an application server on Linux 64bit with 8 core CPUs and 6 GB memory. The server must be highly responsive.
How do I keep a count of the number of times that objects of a specific class (type?) are getting disposed in the lifetime of my application. Imagine I have a class A, now, I want to count how many ti
I have written a managed class that wraps around an unmanaged C++ object, but I found that - when using it in C# - the GC kicks in early while I\'m executing a method on the object. I have read up on
I would like 开发者_运维问答to run a Java program with garbage collection switched off.Managing memory in my own code is not so difficult.
I know that Lua is gc-ed. I know that Lua can deal with 开发者_开发问答c objects via userdata.
See also these related resources: Does the .NET garbage collector perform predictive analysis of code? (on Stack Overflow)
加载中,请稍侯......