I want to implement both active search, where keyword queries matches text content, and passive se开发者_如何学运维arch, where new content matches stored queries, on my google app engine application.
I have a field in my database which contains a word document. This is stored in a varBinary(max) field.
Postgres Full Text Search performance seems to depend on the dictionary you use, here\'s an example my table contains 60000 entries
I am facing a problem on SQL Server 2008 R2 where I have to use a contains search while ignoring German Umlaute-Letters (ä, ö, ü).
What should I do for fast, full-text searching on App Engine with as l开发者_如何学运维ittle work as possible (and as little Java — I’m doing Python.)?I have used Whoosh with appengine in one of my
What minimal开发者_如何学编程 versions of SQL Server and Oracle are supported full text search?Oracle Text is capable for full text search, I suppose you can use it from 9.2 version upwards
Is there any way to directly access the stemmer used in the FORMSOF() option of a CONTAINS Full Text Search query so that it returns the stems/inflections of an input word, not just those derivations
Is there any advantage of using one over the other?Thanks!开发者_JAVA技巧They are similar, except for a small quirk.
I have a fulltext index on column \"SEARCH\". But the query contains additional \"AND\" condition where tinyint column \"VEGETARIAN\" is involved.
This question is easy people. Make a开发者_Go百科utocomplete beautiful in the client side of a web app is simple. There are a lot of plugins.