I\'ve lately encountered a lot of functions where gcc generates really bad code on x86. They all fit a pattern of:
I have to create the following VB.Net code through a C# CodeConditionStatement If Not Nullable.Equals(field.Name, Value) Then
I\'m staring to learn T4 . I want to create a framework for my self that enable me to generate DAL and UI.
I\'ve created a set of classes that represent RESTful resources, and other helper things that actually do the HTTP requests to retrieve and build objects.
Whenever I generate a stub method in VS 2010 I\'m automatically getting a private stub by default.. Is there any way to change once and for all the default choice of the generator to internal for exa
I\'m trying to update an existing C# code. The code is parsed usingICSharpCode.NRefactory.IParser. My system is using widely ICompilationUnit to explore existing code.
I wondered if there are any simpler or more powerful syntax for C or C++. I have already come across SPECS. That is an alternative syntax for C++. But are there any others and what about C?
To create our test data, we use the following variation of the Builder pattern (simplified example!):
is Spring Roo supposed to be only a tool for rapid development of web applications, thanks to all that scaffolding, source code generation and similar stuff, such as grails for groovy.
Everytime I add a new Form to my WinForms project, the designer generates code of a new class which inherits from System.Windows.Forms.Form.
加载中,请稍侯......