I set a static file on Amazon S3 to use Cache-Control: max-age: 259200, must-revalidat开发者_如何学Pythone. However, when I load a test page on my browser in Safari, the resource tracker shows it\'s g
I\'d like to setup browser caching on my site.The problem is that the caching will only be for guests, not logged in users.I know I can throw different headers based on a user\'s logged in status, but
I am working on a test application on Android platform. Test the write/read speed to the sdcard. I write in C language with NDK interface.
Is it possible to avoid any connections from the browser at all if first response headers were set properly?
Background: My webpage loads entries from an XML file via AJAX/jQuery and displays them (works fine) The page also has a form that submits via AJAX/jQuery to a PHP file which writes to the XML file,
We have a cloud setup like this: User Request -> Perlbal (SSL unwrapping) -> Squid (Caching) -> Apache -> HTTP Response
I\'m using the开发者_如何学JAVA Page Speed Firebug extension to help improve page performance. I have an image-heavy page, and one of the suggestions it made is this:
this has been throwing me off for too long.. Posted below is our Rails 3 controller. When attempting to access with Internet Explorer the first time, the download prompt fails with a \"Unable to do
What should a http client do if server returned Cache-Control: private, public ? I have a feeling private should override public, but I can\'t find a confirmation in the RFC (other than MUST in priva
In IIS6, I notice that when \"Enable content expiration\" is not enabled, no cache-related or expiration headers are sent with the response.Yet static content, such as css files are properly returning
加载中,请稍侯......