I\'m trying to compile some fortran code and I\'m running into some confusing linking errors. I have some code that I compile and place into a static library:
I\'ve downloaded the ImageMagick source, compiled the wizard to create a Visual Studio solution 开发者_StackOverflowfor static linkage, and included the static library Magick++ project in my sample pr
I tried to compile Qt+Webkit statically with MS VS 2008 and this worked. C:\\Qt\\4.6.2>configure -release -static -opensource -no-fast -no-exceptions -no-accessibility -no-rtti -no-stl -no-opengl
I want to release an application I developed as a hobby both for Linux and Windows. This application depends on boost (and possibly other libraries). The norm for this kind of application (a chess eng
If I want to make an OS X program as self-contained as possible to ease installation, what开发者_如何学C dynamic libraries can I expect everyone or most people to have? If I know that, I won\'t have t
Are there any compelling performance reasons to choose static linking over dynamic linking or vice versa in certain situations? I\'ve heard or read the following, but I don\'t know enough on the subje
The gnu linker "ld" supplies the option "-sort-common" which sorts the uninitialized global parameters, known as the COMMON section symbols, by their size. When the linker aligns t
If I\'m statically linking a GTK+ program under FreeBSD 8, gtk_builder_add_from_file() suddenly returns with an error:
Consider this scenario: An application links to 3rd party library A. A is built using MSVC 2008 and is statically linking (ie. built with /MT) to the C Runtime Library v9.0.
Consider this code: one.c: #include <stdio.h> int one() { printf(\"one!\\n\"); return 1; } two.c: #include <stdio.h>
加载中,请稍侯......