In C, shall I prefer constants over defines? I\'ve reading a lot of 开发者_高级运维code lately, and all of the examples make heavy use of defines.No, in general you should not use const-qualified obje
I have 3 classes. In it\'s simplest form, it looks like, class tree { public: tree_node* find_node(const std::string& text) {
I tried const int i[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4 }; float f[i[3]]; // g++ cries \"error: array bound is not an integer constant\"
Please consider the following code. struct foo { }; template<typename T> class test { public: test() {}
I\'ve just come across some code that\'s confusing me slightly; there are really 2 variations that I\'d like to clarify.
This question about why constants in Java are uppercase by convention made me try to think of counter example开发者_运维知识库s.
1) Can someone explain the following? void OnCreate(HWND hWnd, con开发者_如何转开发st LPCREATESTRUCT lpCreateStruct)
Firstly, sample codes: Case 1: typedef char* CHARS; typedef CHARS const CPTR;// constant pointer to chars
I have read (and generally agree) that to increase code legibility, you should use constants instead of magic numbers as method parameters. For example, using PHP:
Really simple question about C++ constness. So I was reading this post, then I tried out this code: int some_num = 5;
加载中,请稍侯......