I use a BlockingCollection to implement a producer-consumer pattern in C# 4.0. The BlockingCollection holds items which take up quite a lot memory. I would like to let the producer takes one item ou
I have an 8-core CPU machine with 8 GB memory. Logically the following code can be done in parallel, but since the loop exposes more than enough opportunities for parallelism since I have far fewer co
I am using System.Threading.Tasks.Parallel.For to do some heavyweight processing. My code is: int count = 10;
Imagine you are utilizing Parallelism in a multi-core system. Is it not completely possible that the same instructions may be executed simultaneously?
Platform: WPF, .NET 4.0, C# 4.0 Problem: In the Mainw开发者_StackOverflowindow.xaml i have a ListBox bound to a Customer collection which is currently an ObservableCollection< Customer >.
开发者_开发知识库I\'d like to speed-up the indexing of 10GB of data into a Lucene index.Would TPL be a good way to do this?Would I need to divided the data up into chunks and then have each thread sta
I want to trigger a task to run on a background thread. I don\'t want to wait on the tasks completion.
I\'m working on a project that creates like 20开发者_Go百科~50 new tasks every 30~80 seconds. Each task lives for 10~20 seconds.
I have a Backgroundworker whose purpose is to run jobs sequentially in the background. Now one job is implemented in multithreading way. That mean, the Backgroundworker will create several threads. I
I am running a multi-threaded loop: protected ParallelOptions parallelOptions = new ParallelOptions();