I noticed that with the optional parameters in C# 4 if you specify anoptional parameter on an interface you don,t have to make that parameter optional on any implementing class:
I\'m working with a function whose signature looks like this afunc(string $p1, mixed $p2, array $p3 [, int $p4 = SOM_CONST [, string $p5 ]] )
I have a web application with lots of data, and a search/filter function with several fields, such as name, status, date, and so on. I have been using parameterized queries like this for the regular (
I want to make a Stored Procedure that has a minimum of 2 required parameters, but that it can also be called with 2,3,4,5... and so on parameters.
I\'m working on a Scala API (for Twilio, by the way) where operations have a pretty large amount of parameters and many of these have sensible default values. To reduce typing and increase usability,
I\'m using .NET 4.0 with ASP.NET 4.0 and C# (would that be C# 4.0?). I want to insert some data into my SQL Server database and I have a method like so to handle this:
I know it is possible to use optional arguments as follows: function doSomething($do, $something = \"something\") {
In C++ methods can have optional arguments, like this: void myFunction (int arg1, int arg2=0); In this case myFunction can be called with 1 integer or with two.If you omit the second integer, the v
I think this is a pretty basic question, but I just want to clarify. If I have a variable with a null value, and pass it as a parameter that is optional, will the par开发者_JAVA百科ameter get the null
Given: interface IFoo { void Print(string text = \"abc\"); } class Bar : IFoo { public void Print(string text = \"def\")
加载中,请稍侯......