Would you co开发者_运维百科nsider extending the native elements via the prototype dangerous? I see some frameworks such as Prototype doing this so I have started to wonder if I dare to do that too.
I read that adding functions to an object will chew up more memory then adding functions to the prototype of the object.
I am going insane trying to figure out why this is not working. I am creating a checkbox dynamically with JS to enable/disable a text field (also created dynamically).
I\'m redoing the tooltips on a commercial site and am looking for a good tooltip library to use.Some of the pages use prototype already for other functions, so I need to find something based on pr开发
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this
I have a search form with default values. 开发者_如何学JAVAAs the user loades the page, onload I call a function.
I have a \'website\' that been generated by a client in iWeb. He wants to keep using iwebs and simply upload the generated site however I have noticed some inconsistencies in the CSS of the menu and a
I\'ve been wondering about JavaScript\'s prototypal nature, and the benefits of it, and have come down to the following list :
I have this code: void PrintMainParameters(int n, char* array[]) { int i = 0; for(i = 0; i < n; i++) { printf(\"%s \\n\", array[i]);
I\'ve been coding javascript like this: var Foo = { something: function() { }, someValue: 0, someArray: [],
加载中,请稍侯......