I\'m trying to use one of the simplest forms of reflection to create an instance of class: package some.common.prefix;
I\'m getting \"hiding\" warnings in my compiler because a class inherits from its parent has the same name but different parameters.
Under what situation is it possible for GCC to not throw an \"undefined reference\" link error message when trying to call made-up functions?
I am getting the warning: function used but not defined. I have static __inline__ in header file say a.h. The header file is included in a.c. I would like put all those inline function which are in he
Basically, I have a UserControl that uses a DynamicResources. The application compiles and runs fine using that resource, but it\'s a bit annoying to see this warning message. It makes me wonder if I\
When I try to compile the piece of code below, I get this warning: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
I\'m using boost::variant and am having trouble compiling in release mode. I am working in VC2010 with warning level 4 and warnings as errors. The code below compiles fine in debug mode, but in releas
What\'s the closest GCC equivalent to this MSVC p开发者_StackOverflow中文版reprocessor code? #pragma warning( push )// Save the current warning state.
Sometimes you have a class that is designed to be inherited, but not a开发者_如何学编程ll its functions are expected to be used all the time. Therefore, to make for more readable and easier to maintai
I understand exactly why unused variable warnings occur. I don\'t want to suppress them in开发者_运维百科 general, because they are incredibly useful in most cases. However, consider the following (co