I am struggling with some bizarre behavior in Core Data. I have a fairly standard set-up, using the CoreDataBook example: I have a RootView which is using a NSFetchedResultsController to display list
I\'ve created two entities in core data model (Courier and Occupation in this example), and created an inverse relationship between them, which also caused a crush in开发者_StackOverflow xcode. After
For the third time in a row, I create a blank navig开发者_如何学Goation-based iOS project, create two entities in the core data model, create references from entities to one another, and the second I
I\'m kind of newbie on coredata, and i\'开发者_运维技巧m building a simples database, with the result of an xml.
Original question was \"I have a sqlite 3 db (a dictionary), that I want to use in a new app. Is there a short cut to creating the core data relationship model, based on the db structure?\"
To simplify: There are 3 columns in a table named cards. id packTitle term id is a column - integers from 0.....100
The setup: CoreData Model Product Entity Attribute \"name\" Relationship \"common\" <---> CommonData CommonData Entity
I cannot find any information anywhere (google, cocoadev, developer.apple) about managing an optional to-one relationship with core data and cocoa bindings with the exception of using a pop-up box. Us
As the title suggests im working with a Core Data Application which gets filled with objects in different background threads (XML Parsing)
I\'m scratching my head on this one. I have a work around, but I don\'t understand it so that doesn\'t count. What I want to do is for the entity (in this case a开发者_如何转开发 \"Photo\" lets say),