I know Exception Handling is a very important thing and we are doing it in all our projects. The main reason is to log errors that occur at the customers. This works fine and is not problem at all.
I have methods that all propagate exceptions and then I have handling on one place, however I realized something.
I know you\'re not suppose to write code that caches all exception types like this. try { //code that can throw an exception
We have an application which relies heavily on Adobe Spry. For authentication purposes a Single Sign On Solution is used. (Its a WebSeal, but I don\'t think that matters to much)
I recently created a WCF service (dll) and a service host (exe). I know my WCF service is working correctly since I am able to successfully add the service to WcfTestClient.
I\'m wrapping a java.sql.RecordSet inside a java.util.Iterator. My question is, what should I do in case any recordset method throws an SQLException?
I am facing some odd situation that when I select/deselect the features in the feature customization wizard, it sometimes crashes the window. It does not give any clue at all. It also not happens cons
开发者_StackOverflow中文版The MSDN constructor for a FileStream says that it may throw either an UnauthorizedAccessException or a SecurityException. Here\'s what MSDN says about these exceptions.
I\'m going through some old C#.NET code in an ASP.NET application making sure that all SqlConnections are wrapped in using blocks.
I have a question regarding exception handling. Consider followingJava code snippet. try{ //code }catch(SubSubException subsubex){