Suppose I have: class myclass: def __init__(self): self.foo = \"bar\" where the value of foo needs to be available to users of myclass. Is it OK to just read the value of foo directly from an insta
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
What\'s wrong with using nested classes to group constants? Like so: public static class Constants { public static class CategoryA
I have come up to issues while I\'m trying to write some classes, here is an example: I have this class called TwitterGrub and I cant call it like that:
I am not sure whether it is possible to achieve this kind of implementation in Dot Net. Below are the information
In java adjectives ending in -able are interfaces Serializable, Comparable etc... So why is Throwable a class? Wouldn\'t exception handling be easier if Throwable were an interface? (Edit: e.g. Except
I am currently working on a project where a team of us are designing a game, all of us are proficient in ruby and some (but not all) of us are proficient in c++.
Looking at the (mature) codebase at my new job, there is an interface, and only one class implements it (as far as I can tell). Can/开发者_运维问答should I get rid of the interface?No way!Its has zero
I\'m not sure how to design a couple of classes in my app. Basically that\'s a situation: each user can have many preferences
This question already has answers here: Closed 12 years ago. Possible Duplicates: Using “Base” in a Class Name
加载中,请稍侯......