open System type Foo() = interface Collections.IEnumerable with member x.GetEnumerator () = null type Bar() =
I\'ve got a bunch of classes that can Process() objects, and return their own objects: public override IEnumerable<T> Process(IEnumerable<T> incoming) { ... }
I have a IEnumerable collection of Car objects A Car has a property: Year Using LINQ, I want to find where there are > 1 cars with the same year and return that list.
I\'ve seen plenty of examples (NerdDinner, Sanderson\'s Sports Store, etc.) where a view is bound to a collection of objects.The syntax in the view is usually something like this...
I know it probably doesnt matter/affec开发者_JAVA技巧t performance for the most part but I hate the idea of getting an IEnumerable and doing .Count(). Is there a IsEmpty or NotEmpty or some function?
The model item passed into the dictionary is of type \'...\', but this dictionary requires a model item of type \'...\'
That\'s it. The question is in the title I was looking for a cleaner way than the u开发者_运维问答sing for...break;
If I have an IEnumerable<Foo> allFoos and an IEnumerable<Int32> bestFooIndexes, how can I get a new IEnumerable<Foo> bestFoos containing the Foo开发者_如何学编程 entries from allFoos
What is the difference between ((IEnumerable)source).OfType<T>() and source as IEnumerable<T>
Update: I appreciate all of the comments, which have essentially comprised unanimous opposition. While every objection raised was valid, I feel that the ultimate nail in the coffin was Ani\'s astute o
加载中,请稍侯......